North Carolina remains one of the few U.S. states where jilted spouses can sue a third party for alienating their spouse's affection, a legal concept rooted in old common law. These "homewrecker" laws permit individuals to seek damages from those they believe have destroyed their marriage through adultery or seduction.

The legal framework allows plaintiffs to sue for emotional distress, loss of financial support, and other harms attributed to the affair. While controversial, these laws have seen a resurgence in high-profile cases, including one involving former Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who is reportedly facing an alienation of affection lawsuit in North Carolina.

Recent filings indicate that the spouse of a wealthy businessman has sued Sinema, alleging she was the "homewrecker" responsible for the breakdown of their marriage. The lawsuit claims damages exceeding $75,000, highlighting the substantial financial stakes involved in such cases. These legal actions are not uncommon in North Carolina, where a number of similar suits have been filed over the years.

The continued existence and use of alienation of affection and criminal conversation laws in North Carolina prompt ongoing debate about their relevance in contemporary society. Critics argue these laws are outdated and can be used to harass or extort individuals, while proponents maintain they offer a form of justice and accountability for marital infidelity.