Donald Trump made an unexpected onstage call to Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on Tuesday, using the moment to criticize growing calls for regulation and a slowdown in artificial intelligence development.

The former president contacted Huang while the Nvidia chief executive was speaking at an event in Los Angeles, according to reports. The call served as a platform for Trump to voice his opposition to stricter oversight of the rapidly advancing AI sector.

During the conversation, Trump reportedly dismissed concerns about the potential risks associated with AI, suggesting that slowing down its progress would be detrimental. He did not elaborate on specific safety concerns but broadly advocated for continued, unfettered advancement.

Huang, whose company is at the forefront of AI hardware development, has not publicly commented on the nature of the call or Trump's remarks. Nvidia, as a key supplier of the chips powering AI, is central to the industry's growth and the ongoing debate about its future.

The incident highlights the political dimension of the AI debate, with figures like Trump taking firm stances on the technology's trajectory. While many in the tech industry and policy circles are exploring guardrails and ethical considerations, Trump's intervention signals a contrasting perspective that prioritizes speed and innovation over immediate regulatory intervention.

Nvidia's stock has seen significant gains driven by demand for its high-performance GPUs, essential for training and deploying complex AI models. This economic success has placed the company and its CEO in a prominent position within discussions about AI's societal impact and economic potential.

The call comes at a time when governments worldwide are grappling with how to address the transformative capabilities of AI, from potential job displacement to misinformation and ethical dilemmas. Various proposals for AI regulation are under consideration, reflecting a global effort to balance innovation with safety.

It remains unclear what further actions, if any, will arise from this interaction or how it might influence ongoing discussions about AI governance and development.